From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6976 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2005 16:54:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6967 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jul 2005 16:54:41 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 16:54:41 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.51) id 1DoOml-0005lg-5s; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 12:54:39 -0400 Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 16:54:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Steve Ellcey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Patch to replace BFD_NEED_DECLARATION with AC_CHECK_DECLS Message-ID: <20050701165438.GA22129@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Steve Ellcey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200507011648.JAA14525@hpsje.cup.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200507011648.JAA14525@hpsje.cup.hp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 09:48:56AM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote: > This patch removes the use of BFD_NEED_DECLARATION from gdb/gdbserver > and replaces it with AC_CHECK_DECLS. Once this checkin is done I intend > to remove the definition of BFD_NEED_DECLARATION from the bfd > subdirectory as it is no longer needed now that we are using newer > versions of autoconf that have AC_CHECK_DECLS. > > There is still a use of BFD_NEED_DECLARATION in src/mmalloc but my > understanding is that mmalloc is no longer used and so that use can be > ignored. > > The change was tested on IA64 Linux with no regressions. I have not > done any gdb checkins before but I have done binutils changes and I do > have a gdb copyright assignment on file and write access to the src > repository so I can check this in myself if it is approved. > > OK to checkin? OK. Please list yourself in write-after-approval in gdb/MAINTAINERS, also. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC