From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-40157-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 8851 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2005 20:51:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 8822 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jun 2005 20:51:45 -0000
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 20:51:45 +0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5UKnioK000745;
	Thu, 30 Jun 2005 16:49:44 -0400
Received: from post-office.corp.redhat.com (post-office.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.227])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j5UKniu21855;
	Thu, 30 Jun 2005 16:49:44 -0400
Received: from greed.delorie.com (dj.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.222])
	by post-office.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j5UKnfh05746;
	Thu, 30 Jun 2005 16:49:42 -0400
Received: from greed.delorie.com (greed.delorie.com [127.0.0.1])
	by greed.delorie.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j5UKndNF012928;
	Thu, 30 Jun 2005 16:49:39 -0400
Received: (from dj@localhost)
	by greed.delorie.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j5UKnXmC012925;
	Thu, 30 Jun 2005 16:49:33 -0400
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 20:51:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200506302049.j5UKnXmC012925@greed.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
To: bje+dated+1120547206.7b11cb@air.net.au
CC: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com,
        gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
In-reply-to: <20050630170643.A4871@mailhub.air.net.au> (message from Ben
	Elliston on Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:06:43 +1000)
Subject: Re: some top-level changes
References:  <20050630170643.A4871@mailhub.air.net.au>
X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00390.txt.bz2


We have a number of other projects listed there that aren't part of
our source trees (like "hello" or "textutils").  Why can't expect and
dejagnu have the same status?  Is there any harm in leaving them in?
You never know when some third party (Red Hat Inc comes to mind) will
want to build everything in one tree themselves.