From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15384 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2005 23:14:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15369 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Jun 2005 23:14:26 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 23:14:26 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.51) id 1DjQ2b-0005ny-Ao; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:14:25 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 23:14:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Nick Roberts , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] -stack-info-frames Message-ID: <20050617231425.GA22254@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Nick Roberts , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <17075.21529.964955.923197@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20050617230130.GB21178@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050617230130.GB21178@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00269.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 07:01:30PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 10:52:09AM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote: > > > > Here's a patch for -stack-info-frames. Having just read Jason's e-mail > > about how quick "-stack-list-frames 0 0" is, I'm not sure its necessary. > > I thought I'd send it anyway. > > > > Even if we decide not to implement -stack-info-frames, could you please > > approve the other parts: Not testing for stack, and not allowing an argument > > (mi_cmd_stack_select_frame). > > How do you feel about putting an optional argument on _this_ one? > -stack-select-frame 0; -stack-info-frame is much like > -stack-list-frames 0 0; but "-stack-info-frame 2" doesn't have an > obvious analogue. Waitasec... Nick, sorry, I've been giving you silly suggestions, because I have not spent enough time with the MI manual. Is "-stack-info-frame N" basically the same as "-stack-list-frames N N"? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC