From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29928 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2005 13:45:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29907 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jun 2005 13:45:19 -0000 Received: from s142-179-108-108.bc.hsia.telus.net (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:45:19 +0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 0DD3547E6F; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 06:45:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:45:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/hppa] Can not insert breakpoint at address higher than 0xFFFFFF Message-ID: <20050613134518.GK1173@adacore.com> References: <20050603235918.GD1266@adacore.com> <20050613032349.GI9288@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050613032349.GI9288@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00152.txt.bz2 > > 2005-06-03 Joel Brobecker > > > > * hppa-tdep.c (hppa_pc_requires_run_before_use): Really test all > > bits of top byte in address. > > > > Tested on hppa-hpux, no regression. > > OK to apply? > > Yes, I agree with your reading. This is OK. Thank you, checked in (with the changelog slightly rewritten in what I hope is better English). -- Joel