From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31049 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2005 19:10:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31010 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jun 2005 19:09:59 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 19:09:59 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DeHYL-00008b-N5; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 15:09:57 -0400 Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 19:10:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jeff Johnston Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA]: Upstream bfd patch for ia64 vDSO support Message-ID: <20050603190957.GC32722@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jeff Johnston , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <429E16E9.8010301@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <429E16E9.8010301@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 04:13:29PM -0400, Jeff Johnston wrote: > The attached patch has been checked in to binutils by Jim Wilson. It fixes > a problem with the ia64 vDSO so that gdb can backtrace from system calls. > I need this to check in an ia64/libunwind patch that fixes backtracing > through syscalls. I didn't know if one could just check in upstream bfd > patches without approval so I will ask. May I commit this? GDB and binutils live in the same source repository. Applying it to one applies it to the other, except for release branches of course. There's nothing more to do. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC