From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-39780-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 24033 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2005 20:43:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 24025 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jun 2005 20:43:33 -0000
Received: from lakermmtao03.cox.net (HELO lakermmtao03.cox.net) (68.230.240.36)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 20:43:33 +0000
Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by lakermmtao03.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP
          id <20050601204331.JZKC18229.lakermmtao03.cox.net@white>;
          Wed, 1 Jun 2005 16:43:31 -0400
Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Dda3n-0004qt-00; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 16:43:31 -0400
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 20:43:00 -0000
From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: mi tty commands
Message-ID: <20050601204330.GB17309@white>
Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
References: <20050302025219.GA29948@white> <20050311022644.GA15563@white> <20050522210040.GB9231@white> <20050528230855.GE22435@nevyn.them.org> <uzmue8qsk.fsf@gnu.org> <20050529205435.GA11243@white> <20050601001440.GB15414@white> <uk6leafql.fsf@gnu.org> <20050601130653.GA17103@white> <u3bs1degj.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <u3bs1degj.fsf@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00013.txt.bz2

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 11:11:56PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:06:53 -0400
> > From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
> > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> > 
> > > Which reminds me: now that you introduced "set tty", doesn't that mean
> > > we should remove the "tty" command as redundant?
> > 
> > I don't think so. Simply because the tty command has been around for
> > ages and FE's depend on it being there. Removing the tty command would
> > successfully break every front end.
> 
> Not if we leave "tty" as an alias for "set tty".  Any objections to do
> that as part of your patch?

Yeah, if that leaves the user the 'tty /dev/pts/1' interface, than it's
fine with me. I'd be happy to add it to this patch, I just haven't used
an alias before and will have to look into it.

Thanks,
Bob Rossi