From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1135 invoked by alias); 29 May 2005 00:09:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1124 invoked by uid 22791); 29 May 2005 00:09:16 -0000 Received: from c-66-30-17-189.hsd1.ma.comcast.net (HELO cgf.cx) (66.30.17.189) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 May 2005 00:09:16 +0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 4AB5C13CA7E; Sat, 28 May 2005 20:09:15 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 01:59:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: Use lrealpath instead of gdb_realpath Message-ID: <20050529000915.GF3094@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20050528234233.GA3440@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050528234233.GA3440@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00598.txt.bz2 On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 07:42:34PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >Chris, since mingw32 should be the only affected target, I'll ask you >for approval. OK? I verified that there is no change in behavior on >i686-linux. This is ok, Daniel. Thanks for doing this. cgf