Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [testsuite/alpha] Add test for step over fbne instruction
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 03:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050526031443.GA25712@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050526031128.GA9264@redhat.com>

On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 08:11:28PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 12:35:39PM +1000, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> >      "       cpys $f31,$f31,$f0\n"
> >      "       fbgt $f16,$gt_1\n"      /* stop at this instruction.  */
> >      "       cpysn $f16,$f16,$f0\n"
> >      "$gt_1:\n"
> >      "       ret $31,($26),1\n"
> 
> Hmm, now that I think about it, one potential problem with this form
> is that we're not correctly testing for branch taken.  The scenerio
> is that we expect taken, set the bp on the ret, the branch *isn't*
> taken, but we fall through to the ret anyway.
> 
> We'd do better to write this
> 
>        "       fbgt $f16,$gt_1\n"      /* stop at this instruction.  */
>        "       cpysn $f16,$f16,$f0\n"
>        "       ret $31,($26),1\n"
>        "$gt_1:\n"
>        "       ret $31,($26),1\n"
> 
> so that if we choose wrong, we will in fact lose control.

Then the testsuite is likely to get out of sync - either way, we need
to do a little dance to recover.  Joel, how about checking to see that
the instruction we've stopped on is the correct one - how much would
that complicate the test?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC


  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-26  3:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-25 15:09 Richard Henderson
2005-05-26  3:14 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-05-26  3:27   ` Richard Henderson
2005-05-26  3:41     ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2005-05-26  5:02     ` Joel Brobecker
2005-05-26  6:04       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-28 22:10   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-29  2:53     ` Joel Brobecker
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-20  7:02 Joel Brobecker
2005-05-20 11:31 ` Richard Henderson
2005-05-25  5:15   ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050526031443.GA25712@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=rth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox