From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6566 invoked by alias); 25 May 2005 06:48:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6553 invoked by uid 22791); 25 May 2005 06:48:22 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2005 06:48:22 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j4P6mLhH014844 for ; Wed, 25 May 2005 02:48:21 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j4P6mLO24600 for ; Wed, 25 May 2005 02:48:21 -0400 Received: from ballpeen.sfbay.redhat.com (ballpeen.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.33]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j4P6mJa8019114 for ; Wed, 25 May 2005 02:48:20 -0400 Received: from ballpeen.sfbay.redhat.com (ballpeen.sfbay.redhat.com [127.0.0.1]) by ballpeen.sfbay.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j4P6mJhP005423 for ; Tue, 24 May 2005 23:48:19 -0700 Received: (from rth@localhost) by ballpeen.sfbay.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j4P6mJs2005422 for gdb-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 23:48:19 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: ballpeen.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 15:09:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: gdb-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [testsuite/alpha] Add test for step over fbne instruction Message-ID: <20050525064819.GA5406@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00542.txt.bz2 > Thanks for the couple of suggestions. Is the attached better? Yes, though I'm confused as to why you didn't use the 4 or 5 insn hand-coded routine that I gave you, which is more like what you would get from the compiler with -O2 -ffast-math. In particular, using your -O0 compiler generated version doesn't let you *actually* test the edge conditions of fbge, should you wish to do so. E.g. passing in -0.0, NaN, +Inf, 0x0.0000000000001p-1022, etc. r~