From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19573 invoked by alias); 24 May 2005 13:04:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19551 invoked by uid 22791); 24 May 2005 13:04:27 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2005 13:04:27 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DaZ57-0000Pf-Lc; Tue, 24 May 2005 09:04:25 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 14:11:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Wu Zhou Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] Is this kind of patch welcomed? Message-ID: <20050524130425.GA1543@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Wu Zhou , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00528.txt.bz2 On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 05:13:32AM -0700, Wu Zhou wrote: > This is to fix a typo in remote.c, found while I am reading the > source code. Is this kind of patch welcomed? If it is, should > I add a changelog entry as well? If not, please ignore it. > > Thanks. The patch is fine - but yes, it does need a changelog entry. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC