From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Wu Zhou <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] gdb.server testcases (resend)
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 08:29:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050524020316.GA20554@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0505240222180.29499@plinuxt18.cn.ibm.com>
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 02:32:09AM -0700, Wu Zhou wrote:
> > > normally factorial(6) will recursively call itself 5 times and return
> > > 720. However while using 64-bit gdbserver on 64-bit binary, it doesn't
> > > call factorial(5) at all, return directly 6 as the result.
> > >
> > > I am suspecting that "value > 1" doesn't get executed, so I change the
> > > conditional statement to "if (value - 1)", it worked! So it turn out
> > > that "value > 1" always return 0 in this running context. That is really
> > > odd. Any clues you could thought of? Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Um... your compiler must be broken, then.
>
> Um...can't understand this. If it is like this, how to interpret the fact
> that it returns 720 correctly to run gdb.base/break standalone. Anyway I
> will try to find another box or another compiler to verify this. Thanks.
I missed that in your message. The other alternative is that a
breakpoint is somehow corrupting program state (condition codes, for
instance). This could be a kernel bug or a GDB bug; it wouldn't be the
first time.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-24 2:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-19 14:46 Wu Zhou
2005-05-19 17:52 ` Manoj Iyer
2005-05-28 22:51 ` [commit] gdbserver for powerpc64-linux Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-22 20:40 ` [RFC] gdb.server testcases (resend) Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-22 21:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-23 11:21 ` Wu Zhou
2005-05-23 18:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-24 4:17 ` Wu Zhou
2005-05-24 8:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-17 2:38 Manoj Iyer
2005-05-17 19:02 ` Manoj Iyer
2005-05-18 1:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-18 9:52 ` Manoj Iyer
2005-05-18 16:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-18 16:29 ` Manoj Iyer
2005-05-18 18:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-18 22:08 ` Manoj Iyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050524020316.GA20554@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=woodzltc@cn.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox