From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-39528-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 16866 invoked by alias); 17 May 2005 20:40:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 16435 invoked from network); 17 May 2005 20:40:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 May 2005 20:40:19 -0000
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2])
	by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j4HKdp00031617;
	Tue, 17 May 2005 22:39:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1])
	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4HKdpXw011364;
	Tue, 17 May 2005 22:39:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)
	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j4HKdpmr028149;
	Tue, 17 May 2005 22:39:51 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 01:25:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200505172039.j4HKdpmr028149@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: drow@false.org
CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <20050517203255.GA25422@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel
	Jacobowitz on Tue, 17 May 2005 16:32:55 -0400)
Subject: Re: [RFA] Resurrect v850
References: <20050513114016.GN2805@calimero.vinschen.de> <20050515174426.GA1193@nevyn.them.org> <20050517132348.GF18174@calimero.vinschen.de> <20050517133137.GA3543@nevyn.them.org> <20050517140935.GI18174@calimero.vinschen.de> <200505172029.j4HKTrPs022728@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20050517203255.GA25422@nevyn.them.org>
X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00431.txt.bz2

   Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 16:32:55 -0400
   From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>

   On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 10:29:53PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
   >    Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 16:09:35 +0200
   >    From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
   > 
   >    Hi Daniel,
   > 
   >    Ok, I *think* I have followed all your suggestions and hints throughout
   >    the file.  The result is attached below.
   > 
   > This looks pretty good.  I noticed that v850_register_type returns
   > builtin_type_uint32 for your E_PC_REGNUM.  Did you consider returning
   > builtin_type_void_func_ptr for that register?  It has the nice
   > side-effect that "info registers" displays the function name the pc is
   > currently in.

   Would "set $pc = $pc + 2" still work if $pc is a function pointer?

Seems to work for me on the i386 target that I just modified to do
this ;-).  And amd64 and sparc/sparc64 already do this for quite some
time.  Actually I was surprised to find out that i386 didn't.  Expect
that to be fixed soon ;-).

Mark