From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1724 invoked by alias); 17 May 2005 02:50:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1549 invoked from network); 17 May 2005 02:50:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (138.130.151.180) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 May 2005 02:50:50 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id E514347956; Tue, 17 May 2005 12:50:48 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 04:49:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/alpha] Add handling of FP control insn in software-single step Message-ID: <20050517025048.GL12565@adacore.com> References: <20050517023400.GW1462@adacore.com> <20050517023835.GA19735@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050517023835.GA19735@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00409.txt.bz2 > On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 12:34:00PM +1000, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > Tested on alpha-tru64 5.1a with no regression. It fixes a problem with > > some code but I can't contribute it, as it has been given to us by a > > customer. > > Can you write a test for this in gdb.arch, using an asm to provide the > fbeq instruction that was causing a problem? Let me see what I can do. I tend to prefer tests written in C or Ada, as it can be used on all platforms rather than just on alpha. But perhaps the usage in this case is to prefer asm? -- Joel