From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-39485-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 4621 invoked by alias); 15 May 2005 19:55:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 4041 invoked from network); 15 May 2005 19:55:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 15 May 2005 19:55:26 -0000
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DXPCt-0004ya-LM; Sun, 15 May 2005 15:55:23 -0400
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 20:21:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] Eliminate warnings about snprintf declaration
Message-ID: <20050515195522.GA19088@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
	Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org
References: <01c5570e$Blat.v2.4$1c533160@zahav.net.il> <20050512162453.GA5180@nevyn.them.org> <01c55732$Blat.v2.4$e9bd3640@zahav.net.il> <20050512205103.GB13519@nevyn.them.org> <01c5586c$Blat.v2.4$a7dfc720@zahav.net.il> <20050514141204.GA10684@nevyn.them.org> <01c558a0$Blat.v2.4$2b06ba40@zahav.net.il> <m364xkihbc.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <20050515170435.GB11855@nevyn.them.org> <01c55986$Blat.v2.4$2a6b6c20@zahav.net.il>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <01c55986$Blat.v2.4$2a6b6c20@zahav.net.il>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00388.txt.bz2

On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 10:40:59PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 13:04:35 -0400
> > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> > Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
> > 	gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org
> > 
> > > > bfd/ChangeLog:
> > > > 2005-05-14  Eli Zaretskii  <eliz@gnu.org>
> > > > 
> > > > 	* configure.in: Add snprintf and vsnprintf to AC_CHECK_DECLS.
> > > 
> > > These patches are approved, plus the change to libiberty/configure.ac
> > > which needs the obvious ChangeLog entry.  Thanks.
> > 
> > Eli, please mention regenerating configure in the ChangeLog.
> 
> I didn't send patches for the (regenerated) configure and config.in.
> Should I do that, given that I cannot commit them anyway?

No, you don't need to.  If you mention them in the ChangeLog, that'll
serve as a hint to whoever commits the patch which files need to be
regenerated.

> > Same comment as above applies; please mention configure.
> 
> (And config.in, right?)  Will do.

Good catch.  Yes, thank you.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC