From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 763 invoked by alias); 12 May 2005 15:47:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 394 invoked from network); 12 May 2005 15:47:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 12 May 2005 15:47:18 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DWFu8-0000wn-TT; Thu, 12 May 2005 11:47:16 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 15:53:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Eliminate warnings about snprintf declaration Message-ID: <20050512154716.GA3513@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <01c4c990$Blat.v2.2.2$887ec720@zahav.net.il> <41994B9D.9080809@gnu.org> <01c55702$Blat.v2.4$d4764900@zahav.net.il> <20050512150804.GA1808@nevyn.them.org> <01c55708$Blat.v2.4$cfc9f040@zahav.net.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01c55708$Blat.v2.4$cfc9f040@zahav.net.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00291.txt.bz2 On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 06:38:38PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 11:08:04 -0400 > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > > > I recommend copying the libiberty maintainers directly to get their > > attention. > > Errr... who are they? libiberty/README says to send patches to > gcc-patches, which I did. What am I missing? DJ and Ian. I missed the CC to gcc-patches, sorry. That's plenty. > > That will only affect libiberty.h when building libiberty; it won't > > affect the users of libiberty. > > Then how does one cause libiberty/configure to check for these > declarations and edit libiberty/config.h accordingly? I thought one > should modify configure.ac and the regenerate configure, no? It doesn't matter. libiberty/config.h is not a public file; it is only used while building libiberty. Any project that wants a prototype for these functions is responsible for the check in its own private config.h. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC