From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32156 invoked by alias); 11 May 2005 23:31:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32107 invoked from network); 11 May 2005 23:31:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 11 May 2005 23:31:11 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DW0fW-0002rK-J5; Wed, 11 May 2005 19:31:10 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 23:32:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: cp-names.c vs cp-namespace.c Message-ID: <20050511233110.GA10961@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <01c55664$Blat.v2.4$45620fe0@zahav.net.il> <20050511200716.GA4104@nevyn.them.org> <01c5567f$Blat.v2.4$f5312080@zahav.net.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01c5567f$Blat.v2.4$f5312080@zahav.net.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00261.txt.bz2 On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 02:18:59AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 16:07:17 -0400 > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > > Couldn't you use a separate object directory on DOS, as IIRC we > > recommend everyone do? > > That won't help in this case, since cp-names.o and cp-namespace.o will > also clash. Or did I misunderstood what you mean? No, you understood me perfectly; I hadn't thought about the object files. Drat. And I'd just renamed it to avoid the need for this; too clever for my own good. I will rename the file tomorrow. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC