From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12808 invoked by alias); 11 May 2005 20:07:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12212 invoked from network); 11 May 2005 20:07:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 11 May 2005 20:07:18 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DVxUD-00017L-Hp; Wed, 11 May 2005 16:07:17 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 20:08:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: cp-names.c vs cp-namespace.c Message-ID: <20050511200716.GA4104@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <01c55664$Blat.v2.4$45620fe0@zahav.net.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01c55664$Blat.v2.4$45620fe0@zahav.net.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00254.txt.bz2 On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 11:00:47PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > The names of these two files clash in the 8+3 DOS namespace. (The ARI > script does not catch this because cp-names.c is not in the > repository, it is generated during the build.) Can we please rename > cp-names.c to something different, like cp-name-parser.c or some such? Couldn't you use a separate object directory on DOS, as IIRC we recommend everyone do? Otherwise I'd have to rename the yacc file, I think. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC