From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 351 invoked by alias); 10 May 2005 21:41:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32707 invoked from network); 10 May 2005 21:41:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 May 2005 21:41:14 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DVcTU-0003Yi-3Y; Tue, 10 May 2005 17:41:08 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 21:42:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis Cc: mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for DESTDIR to the simulator core Message-ID: <20050510214108.GA13625@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050510204920.GA24799@ahab.auto.tuwien.ac.at> <20050510205336.GA11701@nevyn.them.org> <200505102135.j4ALZPEp024087@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200505102135.j4ALZPEp024087@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00234.txt.bz2 On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:35:25PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 16:53:36 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 10:49:20PM +0200, Martin Koegler wrote: > > I noticed, that sim is missing the support for DESTDIR in its Makefiles, > > which is supported by all automake based programs. > > > > The patch added support for this feature. Is it possible to apply it to the > > CVS? > > > > mfg Martin Kögler > > PS: Please CC me on replies. > > The heck? You're the third person in the last week to submit this > patch. I hadn't gotten to the oldest one yet. The problem isn't new; > I wonder why everyone is encountering it all of a sudden? > > Oh, that's easy. In the past it was only hooked up to a few embedded > targets, wheras now we build sim for every target based on a processor > that we have a sim more. Are GDB maintainers supposed to review sim > patches now? Always have been. Interesting, when did that change? I seem to recall noticing that we now build it more often - but don't wire up target sim. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC