From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14198 invoked by alias); 10 May 2005 20:53:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13803 invoked from network); 10 May 2005 20:53:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 May 2005 20:53:39 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DVbjU-00034E-Kd; Tue, 10 May 2005 16:53:36 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 21:36:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Martin Koegler Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for DESTDIR to the simulator core Message-ID: <20050510205336.GA11701@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Martin Koegler , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050510204920.GA24799@ahab.auto.tuwien.ac.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20050510204920.GA24799@ahab.auto.tuwien.ac.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00231.txt.bz2 On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 10:49:20PM +0200, Martin Koegler wrote: > I noticed, that sim is missing the support for DESTDIR in its Makefiles, > which is supported by all automake based programs. > > The patch added support for this feature. Is it possible to apply it to the > CVS? > > mfg Martin Kögler > PS: Please CC me on replies. The heck? You're the third person in the last week to submit this patch. I hadn't gotten to the oldest one yet. The problem isn't new; I wonder why everyone is encountering it all of a sudden? > Index: Makefile.in > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/src/sim/Makefile.in,v > retrieving revision 1.6 > diff -u -r1.6 Makefile.in > --- Makefile.in 29 Jan 2005 00:53:13 -0000 1.6 > +++ Makefile.in 10 May 2005 20:37:38 -0000 > @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ > RUNTESTFLAGS= > > FLAGS_TO_PASS = \ > + "DESTDIR=$(DESTDIR)" \ > "prefix=$(prefix)" \ > "exec_prefix=$(exec_prefix)" \ > "bindir=$(bindir)" \ The other two patches did not modify FLAGS_TO_PASS; is this really necessary? I don't believe it is. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC