From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29660 invoked by alias); 7 May 2005 15:51:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29636 invoked from network); 7 May 2005 15:51:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cgf.cx) (66.30.17.189) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 7 May 2005 15:51:03 -0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 0) id 4F21313C752; Sat, 7 May 2005 11:51:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 15:51:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Mark Mitchell , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: MinGW patch for readline?] Message-ID: <20050507155103.GI11243@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Mitchell , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Eli Zaretskii References: <427C15D9.4040000@codesourcery.com> <01c552ec$Blat.v2.4$f519dec0@zahav.net.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01c552ec$Blat.v2.4$f519dec0@zahav.net.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00185.txt.bz2 On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 01:09:10PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 18:11:53 -0700 >> From: Mark Mitchell >> >> Given this message from Chet, is it OK to check in the MinGW readline >> patch I posted previously? > >I'm not sure who should approve this, since Elena is still listed as a >responsible maintainer for readline. If global maintainers can give >an approval, you have mine. And if windows maintainers can give approval, you have mine. cgf