From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 340 invoked by alias); 4 May 2005 23:37:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32318 invoked from network); 4 May 2005 23:37:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cgf.cx) (66.30.17.189) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 4 May 2005 23:37:03 -0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 3671213C7E2; Wed, 4 May 2005 19:37:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 23:37:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] fullname attribute for GDB/MI stack frames Message-ID: <20050504233703.GL30075@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050502204859.GA6090@nevyn.them.org> <01c54f91$Blat.v2.4$f6e0b160@zahav.net.il> <20050503034604.GA437@nevyn.them.org> <01c55017$Blat.v2.4$3cb51f20@zahav.net.il> <20050503194856.GA4477@nevyn.them.org> <01c55021$Blat.v2.4$520aa7a0@zahav.net.il> <20050504133437.GA10578@nevyn.them.org> <20050504183127.GA19094@nevyn.them.org> <01c550eb$Blat.v2.4$24b1dce0@zahav.net.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01c550eb$Blat.v2.4$24b1dce0@zahav.net.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00150.txt.bz2 On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 11:51:08PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Of course, does it matter in practice? Does DJGPP support 'expect'? > >It doesn't. That's why I only care for the functions involved in >this, not about the test case itself. But, conceivably a MinGW port could support expect. I'd like to see a native Windows port provide fully qualified paths, even if that isn't a requirement for DJGPP. cgf