From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26427 invoked by alias); 4 May 2005 14:55:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26099 invoked from network); 4 May 2005 14:55:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cgf.cx) (66.30.17.189) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 4 May 2005 14:55:35 -0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 20CCB13C7E2; Wed, 4 May 2005 10:55:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 14:55:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFC] fullname attribute for GDB/MI stack frames Message-ID: <20050504145535.GJ24661@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Eli Zaretskii References: <01c54f57$Blat.v2.4$4c163500@zahav.net.il> <20050502204859.GA6090@nevyn.them.org> <01c54f91$Blat.v2.4$f6e0b160@zahav.net.il> <20050503034604.GA437@nevyn.them.org> <01c55017$Blat.v2.4$3cb51f20@zahav.net.il> <20050503195650.GD25356@white> <01c55025$Blat.v2.4$00e755e0@zahav.net.il> <20050503213911.GB16440@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <01c55061$Blat.v2.4$5a644e20@zahav.net.il> <20050504114821.GA27168@white> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050504114821.GA27168@white> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00117.txt.bz2 On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 07:48:21AM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: >> Please! I'm gonna cry! you are suggesting to revert the code that took >> hard work to get right! openp used to do d:foo -> d:/foo, but that >> was blatantly wrong and caused bugs. Let's not go that way just >> because some test case doesn't seem 100% right! >> >> I am frustrated by my evident inability to communicate to you all the >> simple truth: openp IS OKAY, IT DOESN'T NEED ANY FIXING! > >From this email, I understand completly why it would be impossible for >GDB to translate \abc into an absolute path. If the compiler was nieve >enought to put \abc, it's possible that the current drive is different >when GDB looks for the file then when the user compiled it. (Sorry, I >know you already said this, but I believe if I type it all out, it just >might sink in) > >I asked a question in this Email, >http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2005-05/msg00100.html Has anyone actually confirmed that gcc will put \abc or x:abc in source files? cgf