From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17185 invoked by alias); 3 May 2005 22:27:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16988 invoked from network); 3 May 2005 22:26:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cgf.cx) (66.30.17.189) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 3 May 2005 22:26:47 -0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 3F17913C7E2; Tue, 3 May 2005 18:26:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 22:27:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] fullname attribute for GDB/MI stack frames Message-ID: <20050503222647.GA19896@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050502195515.GA10429@nevyn.them.org> <01c54f57$Blat.v2.4$4c163500@zahav.net.il> <20050502204859.GA6090@nevyn.them.org> <01c54f91$Blat.v2.4$f6e0b160@zahav.net.il> <20050503034604.GA437@nevyn.them.org> <01c55017$Blat.v2.4$3cb51f20@zahav.net.il> <20050503195650.GD25356@white> <01c55025$Blat.v2.4$00e755e0@zahav.net.il> <20050503213911.GB16440@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20050503222401.GA10377@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050503222401.GA10377@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00097.txt.bz2 On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 06:24:01PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 05:39:11PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> Anyway, it seems like the mingw port should be using GetFullPathName() >> in gdb_realpath(). > >libiberty/lbasename.h: > > /* cygwin has realpath, so it won't get here. */ ># if defined (_WIN32) ># define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN ># include /* for GetFullPathName */ ># endif > >So we call Cygwin's realpath or Window's GetFullPathName if we fall >through to the lrealpath call. > >I don't know any of this affects DJGPP... Ah. Sorry. I didn't dig far enough. So, I guess I don't understand Eli's comments, then. cgf