From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18091 invoked by alias); 2 May 2005 19:14:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18028 invoked from network); 2 May 2005 19:14:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 2 May 2005 19:14:24 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1DSgN5-0004OL-Ln; Mon, 02 May 2005 15:14:23 -0400 Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 19:14:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jim Blandy Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: gdb.base/auxv.exp: 'untested' instead of gdb_suppress_entire_file Message-ID: <20050502191423.GA16849@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jim Blandy , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00056.txt.bz2 On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 02:10:31PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote: > > Looking at this message: > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2005-04/msg00143.html > > I gather that changes like the below are welcome --- right? > > 2005-05-02 Jim Blandy > > * gdb.base/auxv.exp: Call 'untested' and return -1 instead of > calling gdb_suppress_entire_file. Please, yes. The results of gdb_suppress_entire_file are so messy! -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC