Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: cagney@gnu.org
Cc: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [commit] note non-building architectures
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 16:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200505021635.j42GZHeH011543@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42764DD6.3070902@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Mon, 02 May 2005 11:57:10 -0400)

   Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 11:57:10 -0400
   From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>

   Mark Kettenis wrote:
   >    Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 19:11:47 -0400
   >    From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
   > 
   >    As part of getting ready for GCC 4, I've found that a number of arches 
   >    don't build with gcc-3.4 when using gdb_mbuild.sh.  As an aid, and to 
   >    stop me and presumably others from going round in circles, I've updated 
   >    the MAINTAINERS file to both reflect current reality note the problem.
   > 
   > I think your GCC 3.4 is busted.

   My GCC?  What a strange turn of expression.  I'm pretty sure the warning 
   will also happen with your gcc.

Nope, 2.95.3 and 3.3.5 are fine.  And as Andreas Schwab there's a GCC
bug report for this problem.  Alas, this is not an ideal world where
compiler warnings involve no false positives.

This will probably be fixed eventually, either on the GCC side, or by
adding a workaround to BFD.  Meanwhile I want us to take notice that
the fact that vax and m68k are in pretty good shape and that listing
them as broken in MAINTAINERS is no indication that there is something
wrong with those targets themselves.

Mark


  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-02 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-01 23:14 Andrew Cagney
2005-05-01 23:32 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-05-01 23:54   ` Andreas Schwab
2005-05-02 15:58   ` Andrew Cagney
2005-05-02 16:35     ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2005-05-02 16:50       ` Stan Shebs
2005-05-10  3:47 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2005-05-19 16:53   ` Andrew Cagney
2005-05-19 19:31     ` Hans-Peter Nilsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200505021635.j42GZHeH011543@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
    --to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox