From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10968 invoked by alias); 1 May 2005 19:02:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10942 invoked from network); 1 May 2005 19:02:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 May 2005 19:02:22 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1DSJhq-0002Sx-Py; Sun, 01 May 2005 15:02:18 -0400 Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 19:02:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii , Dennis Brueni , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] fullname attribute for GDB/MI stack frames Message-ID: <20050501190218.GA9429@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Dennis Brueni , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050430191755.GF7009@nevyn.them.org> <20050501021945.GA19962@white> <01c54e7a$Blat.v2.4$e31afae0@zahav.net.il> <20050501183444.GA20757@white> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050501183444.GA20757@white> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2 On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 02:34:44PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: > Either way, I'm going to submit a patch later today which will add a > variable to mi-support.exp similar to mi_gdb_prompt. The variable will > describe the syntax of a fullname field. It will abstract the details > and complications from new users trying to write testcase's. > > I'll try to find time to make this quick change tonight. If people don't > like this idea, let me know. How about adding a variable to lib/gdb.exp to describe the format of an absolute path, instead? Unless you were planning to check for proper quoting, et cetera. I think this would be more useful. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC