From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2514 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2005 19:53:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2502 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2005 19:53:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 30 Apr 2005 19:53:06 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1DRy1P-0001zM-Vx; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 15:53:04 -0400 Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 19:53:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Nick Roberts Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH: gdb/mi] gdb-mi.el Message-ID: <20050430195303.GC6713@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Nick Roberts , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <16933.30246.584286.198915@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <16955.41571.706228.362525@farnswood.snap.net.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16955.41571.706228.362525@farnswood.snap.net.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00458.txt.bz2 On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 04:54:11PM +1300, Nick Roberts wrote: > Nick Roberts (2 Mar 2005) writes: > > > This patch updates gdb-mi.el so that it works again with Emacs in the CVS > > repository at Savannah (Emacs 22.0.50) which, hopefully, will be released, > > one day, as Emacs 22. I plan to update this file to reflect the current and > > future changes I make for MI in GDB. The slow release cycle of Emacs makes > > it impossible to track these changes from the Emacs side. > > > > Nick > > > > Comment from gdb-mi.el: > > ;; This file uses GDB/MI as the primary interface to GDB. It is still under > > ;; development and is part of a process to migrate Emacs from annotations > > ;; (as used in gdb-ui.el) to GDB/MI. > > I've updated this patch to include the new option to the MI command, > -var-update, that I've described in my previous post. > > As this file is separate code, it can't break GDB. Could a global maintainer > please authorise this commit. Could you please include a ChangeLog entry for the pdate? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC