From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29622 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2005 19:47:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29604 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2005 19:47:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 30 Apr 2005 19:47:16 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1DRxvo-0001sS-Hs; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 15:47:16 -0400 Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 19:47:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Paul Gilliam , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] test for altivec h/w on PowerPC Message-ID: <20050430194716.GA6713@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Gilliam , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200503011519.39739.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <200503021346.35253.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <20050303172642.GB18681@nevyn.them.org> <200503091638.16585.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <20050329204449.GC20646@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050329204449.GC20646@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00456.txt.bz2 On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 03:44:49PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:38:16PM -0800, Paul Gilliam wrote: > > Ok, I have made all the requested chanages and tested it on powerpc with and with out altivec. > > > > NOTE: this patch depends on a previous patch so that gdb.arch/altivec-*.exp can compile their test programs. The previous patch is here: > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2005-03/msg00157.html > > > > 2005-03-09 Paul Gilliam > > > > * lib/gdb.exp: New proc 'skip_altivec_tests' > > * gdb.arch/altivec-abi.exp, gdb.arch/altivec-regs.exp: Use the new proc. > > OK. Some more adjustment may be needed but let's wait and see. Paul, you may have missed these approvals. Going to commit these patches? BTW, please use the ChangeLog I suggested earlier in this thread; the above is wrong. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC