From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24306 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2005 16:10:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20301 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2005 16:07:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cgf.cx) (66.30.17.189) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 29 Apr 2005 16:07:53 -0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 9CC7B13C1C8; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:07:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:10:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Mark Mitchell , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, bug-readline@gnu.org, drow@false.org, ezannoni@redhat.com, chet.ramey@case.edu, Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: PATCH: Readline on MinGW Message-ID: <20050429160753.GI10017@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Mitchell , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, bug-readline@gnu.org, drow@false.org, ezannoni@redhat.com, chet.ramey@case.edu, Eli Zaretskii References: <4270886B.1020806@codesourcery.com> <01c54c2d$Blat.v2.4$f3029840@zahav.net.il> <20050428201215.GA14846@nevyn.them.org> <42714B6F.1030009@codesourcery.com> <42714EFC.9020500@case.edu> <42718368.6030101@codesourcery.com> <01c54c8c$Blat.v2.4$f5638680@zahav.net.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01c54c8c$Blat.v2.4$f5638680@zahav.net.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00429.txt.bz2 On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:26:52AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:44:24 -0700 >> From: Mark Mitchell >> CC: Daniel Jacobowitz , Eli Zaretskii , >> bug-readline@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com >> >> Eli, et. al., does that mean that it's OK to check the patch into GDB >> now? > >It's fine with me. MAINTAINERS lists Elena Zannoni (CC'ed) as the >responsible maintainer for Readline, with ``host maintainers'' being >responsible for host-dependent parts. I guess Chris Faylor could >count as such a host maintainer for Windows; my humble knowledge of >Windows says your changes are okay, FWIW. I have no problems with the patch. I didn't comment because I didn't think my maintainership reached into readline. >Elena, could you please look at Mark's patches and comment on them? I thought that Elena really only maintained readline insofar as getting readline to work nicely in the gdb build environment. All of these patches seem to be Chet's call, to me. cgf