From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-39063-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 16416 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2005 14:35:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 16172 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2005 14:35:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 29 Apr 2005 14:35:40 -0000
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2])
	by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j3TEZe4R025836
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:35:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1])
	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j3TEZdTS015334
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:35:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)
	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j3TEZdTO024118;
	Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:35:39 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 14:35:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200504291435.j3TEZdTO024118@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <20050429142503.GG2572@calimero.vinschen.de> (message from
	Corinna Vinschen on Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:25:03 +0200)
Subject: Re: [RFA] h8300-tdep.c: Rewrite frame code, de-deprecate, ...
References: <20050428153232.GD2572@calimero.vinschen.de> <20050428190307.GA11632@nevyn.them.org> <20050429091018.GN2572@calimero.vinschen.de> <20050429133535.GB19942@nevyn.them.org> <20050429142503.GG2572@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00425.txt.bz2

   Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:25:03 +0200
   From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>

   On Apr 29 09:35, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
   > It's not that it is "used throughout GDB", it's that it's a
   > pre-existing technique.  We've been trying to migrate away from it. 
   > Nine targets do use it, fifteen have been updated not to.  Using it
   > improves consistency and reduces duplicated code - it would eliminate
   > the entire contents of h8300_frame_prev_register, for instance.

   I've checked in h8300-tdep.c as is, plus the changes to Makefile.in
   and MAINTAINERS.  But I promise to use trad-frame for the next target
   I'm working on resurrecting, which is v850.

But who's going to do this for h8300?

Mark