From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2588 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2005 14:25:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2145 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2005 14:25:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 29 Apr 2005 14:25:14 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j3TEPEgf013819 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:25:14 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j3TEPDO10447 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:25:13 -0400 Received: from calimero.vinschen.de (vpn50-71.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.71]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j3TEPAth028626 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:25:11 -0400 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6BE076D404D; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:25:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 14:25:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] h8300-tdep.c: Rewrite frame code, de-deprecate, ... Message-ID: <20050429142503.GG2572@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050428153232.GD2572@calimero.vinschen.de> <20050428190307.GA11632@nevyn.them.org> <20050429091018.GN2572@calimero.vinschen.de> <20050429133535.GB19942@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050429133535.GB19942@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00424.txt.bz2 On Apr 29 09:35, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > It's not that it is "used throughout GDB", it's that it's a > pre-existing technique. We've been trying to migrate away from it. > Nine targets do use it, fifteen have been updated not to. Using it > improves consistency and reduces duplicated code - it would eliminate > the entire contents of h8300_frame_prev_register, for instance. I've checked in h8300-tdep.c as is, plus the changes to Makefile.in and MAINTAINERS. But I promise to use trad-frame for the next target I'm working on resurrecting, which is v850. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Project Co-Leader Red Hat, Inc.