From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-39008-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 20702 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2005 17:47:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 20497 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2005 17:46:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 27 Apr 2005 17:46:51 -0000
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2])
	by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j3RHklFs030926;
	Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:46:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1])
	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j3RHklf1009661;
	Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:46:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)
	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j3RHkgEL005910;
	Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:46:42 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:47:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200504271746.j3RHkgEL005910@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: drow@false.org
CC: pgilliam@us.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <20050427155500.GA8399@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel
	Jacobowitz on Wed, 27 Apr 2005 11:55:00 -0400)
Subject: Re: [patch] update gdb.base/gdb1555.exp to use new shared library infrastructure
References: <200504131011.18676.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <20050414192057.GH26377@nevyn.them.org> <200504191731.05658.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <20050427155500.GA8399@nevyn.them.org>
X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00370.txt.bz2

   Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 11:55:00 -0400
   From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>

   Two things: in the future, you don't need to mention updating the
   copyright date in the changelog unless you're doing archeology.
   Researching missing years is a change worth documenting, adding the
   current year should be automatic.

Oh I didn't know that.  I fully agree with your reasoning though.  So
I'll happily leave this out of the ChangeLogs in the future.

Mark