From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31246 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2005 16:00:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31086 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2005 15:59:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 25 Apr 2005 15:59:57 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1DQ603-0004QR-PO; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 11:59:55 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 16:00:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: "M.M. Kettenis" Cc: Christopher Faylor , Mark Mitchell , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH: Support Windows in event-loop.c Message-ID: <20050425155955.GA16975@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: "M.M. Kettenis" , Christopher Faylor , Mark Mitchell , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050425145023.GD6543@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <7320615710191969@webhare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7320615710191969@webhare> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00315.txt.bz2 On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 03:51:41PM +0000, M.M. Kettenis wrote: > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > >On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 09:16:12AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >>On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 12:24:14AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>> On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 04:57:36PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > >>> >Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > >Ok... So, is it acceptable to include a console-only implementation in > >event-loop.c? I would think that it wasn't. > > > >That seems to suggest that some kind of generic select or poll > >implementation needs to be developed, probably using threads. > > Over my dead body (the threads part that is). Unfortunately there appears to be exactly zero other ways to do this in Windows. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC