From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23487 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2005 15:36:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23404 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2005 15:35:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 25 Apr 2005 15:35:58 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1DQ5cj-0004AP-AT; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 11:35:49 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:36:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Mitchell Cc: Christopher Faylor , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH: Support Windows in event-loop.c Message-ID: <20050425153549.GA15967@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Mitchell , Christopher Faylor , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050424221806.GA13942@nevyn.them.org> <426C3270.4050608@codesourcery.com> <20050425042414.GA7322@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20050425131611.GA7821@nevyn.them.org> <20050425145023.GD6543@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <426D05D6.8010903@codesourcery.com> <20050425150422.GA13753@nevyn.them.org> <426D0A11.4060604@codesourcery.com> <20050425152324.GA15521@nevyn.them.org> <426D0C1D.8040600@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <426D0C1D.8040600@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00312.txt.bz2 On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 08:26:21AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > >Can't you borrow Cygwin's, or the one from Emacs that Eli referenced? > >No need to reinvent the wheel. > > Yes, I'll try that. But, I don't want people to get false expectations; > the one from Emacs is very incomplete. The one from Cygwin is very > complete, but also appears complex and dependent on lots of other bits > of Cygwin. > > Now, assuming I can do this, do y'all want me to try to put this in > libiberty, or in GDB itself? No idea. I think in GDB is OK. In that case it should probably be encapsulated as "gdb_select". -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC