From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10655 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2005 21:17:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10592 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2005 21:17:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 18 Apr 2005 21:17:25 -0000 Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2]) by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j3ILHKxk021659; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 23:17:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j3ILHKnp025753; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 23:17:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j3ILHKv0018730; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 23:17:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 21:17:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200504182117.j3ILHKv0018730@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: msnyder@redhat.com CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <42641057.90102@redhat.com> (message from Michael Snyder on Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:53:59 -0700) Subject: Re: [commit] add mn10300-prologue.o to makefile frag References: <42640CC9.5030707@redhat.com> <200504181945.j3IJjo7k025399@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <42641057.90102@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00203.txt.bz2 Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:53:59 -0700 From: Michael Snyder Mark Kettenis wrote: > Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:38:49 -0700 > From: Michael Snyder > > Overlooked... > > 2005-04-18 Michael Snyder > > * config/mn10300/mn10300.mt: Add mn10300-prologue module. > > Hmm, is there any reason why there are two files with mn10300-specific > target-dependent code? No. I just split that code out for my convenience while I was working on it. I can merge them together if anyone feels strongly about it. I'd prefer it if you do. I know alpha sets a precedent for splitting out some of its unwinders, but I don't think it really makes sense to this code in two files if both are always linked in. Mark