From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29134 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2005 19:36:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28955 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2005 19:36:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 15 Apr 2005 19:36:33 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1DMWcD-0002Ah-Be; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 15:36:33 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 19:36:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Paul Gilliam Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] seperate HP aCC compiler_info into Major, Minor, and Extension Message-ID: <20050415193633.GA8294@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Gilliam , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200504081521.07587.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <20050414191631.GF26377@nevyn.them.org> <200504151234.14115.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200504151234.14115.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00163.txt.bz2 On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 11:34:14AM -0800, Paul Gilliam wrote: > or just forget the whole thing? Maybe this is more futzing around than it's worth. > (But I do like it when things are consistant.) I'd rather drop it. If you're looking at this number, then you know you want a version of the HP aCC compiler already; so let's leave it in the aCC format. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC