From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2945 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2005 19:42:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2932 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2005 19:42:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO e33.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.131) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 15 Apr 2005 19:42:55 -0000 Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.11]) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j3FJgq4I704702 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 15:42:52 -0400 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id j3FJgqYh295800 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:42:52 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j3FJgqwf005245 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:42:52 -0600 Received: from dyn9047022123-009047022128.beaverton.ibm.com (dyn9047022123-009047022128.beaverton.ibm.com [9.47.22.128]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j3FJgpCr005215; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:42:52 -0600 From: Paul Gilliam Reply-To: pgilliam@us.ibm.com To: Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [patch] seperate HP aCC compiler_info into Major, Minor, and Extension Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 19:42:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200504081521.07587.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <200504151234.14115.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <20050415193633.GA8294@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20050415193633.GA8294@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200504151242.34712.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00165.txt.bz2 On Friday 15 April 2005 12:36, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 11:34:14AM -0800, Paul Gilliam wrote: > > or just forget the whole thing? Maybe this is more futzing around than it's worth. > > (But I do like it when things are consistant.) > > I'd rather drop it. If you're looking at this number, then you know > you want a version of the HP aCC compiler already; so let's leave it in > the aCC format. > Well, it was fun while it lasted. 8-) For me, being a ppc64 person, it was academic anyway. Sorry for any wasted time/effort. -=# Paul #=-