From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28151 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2005 08:01:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28109 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2005 08:01:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 15 Apr 2005 08:01:30 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j3F81Uxg009468 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 04:01:30 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j3F81TO31758 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 04:01:29 -0400 Received: from cygbert.vinschen.de (vpn50-14.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.14]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j3F81RYE003988 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 04:01:28 -0400 Received: by cygbert.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 14FC257D95; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:01:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 08:01:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Resurrect sh64 target Message-ID: <20050415080119.GA13574@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050330174336.GQ2495@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20050413151936.GN22241@cygbert.vinschen.de> <200504131822.j3DIMwJ1030800@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200504131822.j3DIMwJ1030800@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00154.txt.bz2 On Apr 13 20:22, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:19:36 +0200 > From: Corinna Vinschen > > On Mar 30 19:43, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > the below patch resurrects sh64-elf. I reworked the sh64 code so that it > > Second iteration. It removes the DEPRECATED_TM_FILE by dropping > shared library support for now. So there's now really no > deprecated mechanism left. > > Ok to apply? > > Looks good to me, so go ahead. Thank you! Applied. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Project Co-Leader Red Hat, Inc.