From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13815 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2005 18:41:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13795 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2005 18:40:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 14 Apr 2005 18:40:56 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1DM9Gp-0004UE-Vy for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:40:56 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 18:41:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: Update ARM architecture selection, add set arm abi Message-ID: <20050414184055.GB26377@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050330203140.GA10953@nevyn.them.org> <1113051852.695.4.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1113051852.695.4.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00130.txt.bz2 On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 02:04:13PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > > OK? I've tested this as much as I can by inspection, on both APCS and AAPCS > > binaries, but another pair of eyes would be appreciated. Revised versions > > of two of the csl-arm-branch patches will use this machinery. > > Sorry for the delay getting around to reviewing this patch. > > Yes, this is fine, thanks. Thanks, checked in. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC