From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19578 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2005 20:41:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19544 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2005 20:41:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 11 Apr 2005 20:41:32 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1DL5iu-0001rL-0j for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 16:41:32 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 20:41:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Drop MI maintenance Message-ID: <20050411204131.GA7127@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <4257228B.9040303@gnu.org> <20050411203317.GB18066@white> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050411203317.GB18066@white> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00089.txt.bz2 On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 04:33:17PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: > I have several goals in mind for GDB/MI. I've posted several patches to > the list to modify the testsuite to do syntax checking. Is anyone going > to be able to allow this patch into GDB? or am I up the stream without a > maintainer? Without a more specific maintainer, any global maintainer can review MI patches. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC