From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-38674-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 24467 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2005 19:18:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 24434 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2005 19:18:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2005 19:18:31 -0000
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2])
	by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j33JIT6Z019858;
	Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:18:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1])
	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j33JISvK015437;
	Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:18:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)
	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j33JIOIV016132;
	Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:18:24 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:18:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200504031918.j33JIOIV016132@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: drow@false.org
CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <20050403042553.GA28315@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel
	Jacobowitz on Sat, 2 Apr 2005 23:25:54 -0500)
Subject: Re: RFC: mips-linux software single step versus sigreturn
References:  <20050403042553.GA28315@nevyn.them.org>
X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00036.txt.bz2

   Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 23:25:54 -0500
   From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>

   Any comments?

Is the extra indirection via os_methods really necessary?

Mark