From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2112 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2005 23:07:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1980 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2005 23:06:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO e34.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.132) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2005 23:06:59 -0000 Received: from westrelay03.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.12]) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j31N6w5b539936 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 18:06:58 -0500 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (d03av03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.169]) by westrelay03.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id j31N6whK217904 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:06:58 -0700 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j31N6wPJ018232 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:06:58 -0700 Received: from dyn9047022123-009047022128.beaverton.ibm.com (dyn9047022123-009047022128.beaverton.ibm.com [9.47.22.128]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j31N6vg8018208 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:06:58 -0700 From: Paul Gilliam Reply-To: pgilliam@us.ibm.com To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] Allow compilation by IBM's xlc compiler Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 23:07:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200504011440.16592.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <20050401224525.GA2344@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20050401224525.GA2344@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200504011503.35642.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00018.txt.bz2 On Friday 01 April 2005 14:45, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 02:40:16PM -0800, Paul Gilliam wrote: > > > > > > Several of your mails have been empty - not useful. Please don't exagerate: it's only 40% 8-) > Also, they could all do with a little explanation. I thought the subject was enough, but if you want more detail, I can do that. Basicly we're just trying to get the testsuite to run with the IBM xlc compiler. For the most part, it's just renameing the flags: -qmkshrobj for -shared, -qpic for -fpic and that kind of thing. In one case, xlc was puting out a warning that gcc doesn't and that had be turned off. > The patches for -shared are not great. I posted a testcase (several > months ago, for a patch which is still pending) which moved the > PIC/shared tests to lib/gdb.exp. One of us should dust off that patch > if you need to add cases to every one of them. > Could you give me a URL to your testsuite patch? I have 6 or so of these so If you have a better way, I'd love to use it. Thanks, -=# Paul #=-