From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14457 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2005 00:59:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14429 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2005 00:59:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2005 00:59:19 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1DHAWe-0004bA-72; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:00:40 -0500 Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:59:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Snyder Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] mips_abi_update, flush_cached_frames Message-ID: <20050401010040.GA17642@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Snyder , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <015a01c53655$98481cb0$8ca66b80@msnyder8600> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <015a01c53655$98481cb0$8ca66b80@msnyder8600> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 04:56:05PM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote: > Check me out here -- if you change the abi, it seems to me > you better make sure you get rid of any cached frames... > > 2005-03-31 msnyder > > * mips-tdep.c (mips_abi_update): If abi is changed, cached > frames better be flushed. Yes and no - I don't think this is the right place to do it. My current feeling is that this belongs in deprecated_current_gdbarch_select_hack. [You're definitely right about the problem, though. I ran into this on ARM last week.] -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC