From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11678 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2005 16:56:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11604 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2005 16:56:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2005 16:56:46 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1DGK2I-00038F-LJ for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:57:50 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:56:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] Use dwarf2 unwinding on ARM Message-ID: <20050329165750.GA11957@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050325211209.GA2461@nevyn.them.org> <1112111179.12337.9.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1112111179.12337.9.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00375.txt.bz2 On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 04:46:19PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 21:12, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > > > We talked last year about turning on dwarf2-based unwinding for ARM. The > > problem was that older versions of GCC would emit incorrect unwind > > information for Thumb functions, but that's been fixed for a while > > now; I think it's time to throw the switch in GDB. > > > > Committed to csl-arm-20050325-branch. OK for HEAD? > > I'd forgotten that we hadn't. Yes, this is ok for head too. Thanks, committed. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC