From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10227 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2005 15:54:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10209 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2005 15:54:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2005 15:54:38 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1DEUfp-0007gF-WB for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:55:06 -0500 Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:54:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [mi] organize possible exec async mi oc command reasons Message-ID: <20050324155505.GA29185@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050324154602.GA10558@white> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050324154602.GA10558@white> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00299.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:46:02AM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote: > BTW, someone please tell me if the testsuite diff is OK, for some reason > there are minor differences between a fresh checkout and my patched > tree, although, I think it has nothing to do with my changes. Those tests all change on repeat runnings. I'm not sure why manythreads fails for you; may be an old kernel. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC