Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: jitendra@linsyssoft.com
Cc: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch] gdbserver fails on 32-bit ppc rfs running in a-64 bit 2.6 linux kernel
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:49:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200503221849.j2MInUBs002127@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1111500324.4237.33.camel@ind> (message from Jitendra Pawar on Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:35:24 +0530)

   From: Jitendra Pawar <jitendra@linsyssoft.com>
   Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:35:24 +0530

   > > >On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 06:36:22PM +0530, Amit S. Kale wrote:
   > > >> The strtoul change in my patch was already present. Sorry about that.
   > > >> 
   > > >> You have changed the data type of thread_resume::thread as well as cont_thread 
   > > >> to unsigned long. "cont_thread = -1" and "(cont_thread > 0)" are still in 
   > > >> place. How does this work?

   There are about 15 files in gdb source have statement pid_to_ptid (-1);
   which finally returns -1 to server. Is it OK to replace  -1 with 0 ?

Certainly not.  pid_to_ptid(-1), a.k.a. minus_one_ptid has a very
special meaning within gdb.  See the comment in inferior.h.

Mark


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-03-22 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-16 16:54 Jitendra Pawar
2005-03-16 16:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-22 14:11   ` Jitendra Pawar
2005-03-22 14:23     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-22 14:50       ` Jitendra Pawar
2005-03-22 14:54         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-23 10:03           ` Jitendra Pawar
2005-03-23 15:43             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-24 13:42               ` Jitendra Pawar
2005-03-24 14:02                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-22 18:49     ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-14 16:07 Amit S. Kale
2005-03-14 16:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-14 16:57   ` Christopher Faylor
2005-03-14 17:02     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-15 13:07   ` Amit S. Kale
2005-03-16  3:16     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-17  4:00       ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200503221849.j2MInUBs002127@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
    --to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=jitendra@linsyssoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox