From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7556 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2005 11:14:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7452 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2005 11:14:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 20 Mar 2005 11:14:27 -0000 Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2]) by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j2KBE7mN000387; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 12:14:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2KBE6xV013331; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 12:14:06 +0100 (CET) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j2KBE12K023890; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 12:14:01 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 11:14:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200503201114.j2KBE12K023890@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: drow@false.org CC: jimb@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20050320023307.GA12519@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Sat, 19 Mar 2005 21:33:07 -0500) Subject: Re: RFC: Add 'double' member to 64-bit vector register type References: <20050319153709.GA4659@nevyn.them.org> <20050320023307.GA12519@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00258.txt.bz2 Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 21:33:07 -0500 From: Daniel Jacobowitz On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 04:13:12PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote: > Well, that brings up the other thought --- since the set of types > useful to include in a vector register really depends on the > architecture, wouldn't it be better to just export the convenience > functions for constructing these types from gdbtypes.c and then let > architectures build ones that actually suit their needs? My inclination is "yes". Anybody else? I agree. Mark