From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23956 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2005 19:52:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23898 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2005 19:51:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2005 19:51:59 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.44 #1 (Debian)) id 1DC12A-0003Ot-PG; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:51:54 -0500 Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:52:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Snyder Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: dumb question; mips multi-abi Message-ID: <20050317195154.GA13010@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Snyder , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <4239DD2B.8070306@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4239DD2B.8070306@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00231.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 11:40:27AM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote: > I confess I have not been following the development of ABI support > very closely. I have a user who wants to debug an application that > uses a mix of (essentially) o32 and o64 code. I think he has some > sort of calling translation layer between the two. > > Is that at all possible? Can gdb switch back and forth on the fly, > while debugging a single app? Maybe manually? Maybe without expecting > to be able to bridge the backtrace? Manually should work fine - set mips abi. In practice in HEAD I think you get an internal error from a missing call to flush_cached_frames(); that's on my list to push out this month, I hope... Automatically, I have no idea. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC