From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8611 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2005 16:57:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8417 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2005 16:57:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2005 16:57:09 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.44 #1 (Debian)) id 1DBbpR-0001u4-7U; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 11:57:05 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:57:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jitendra Pawar Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] gdbserver fails on 32-bit ppc rfs running in a-64 bit 2.6 linux kernel Message-ID: <20050316165705.GA7195@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jitendra Pawar , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <1110991758.5464.8.camel@ind> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1110991758.5464.8.camel@ind> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00221.txt.bz2 On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:19:18PM +0530, Jitendra Pawar wrote: > Hi, > > >On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 06:36:22PM +0530, Amit S. Kale wrote: > >> The strtoul change in my patch was already present. Sorry about that. > >> > >> You have changed the data type of thread_resume::thread as well as cont_thread > >> to unsigned long. "cont_thread = -1" and "(cont_thread > 0)" are still in > >> place. How does this work? > > > >Hmm, looks like you found a real problem here; would you like to fix > >it? Modern GDBs don't heavily use this code, because of the vCont > >packet. Otherwise I'll fix it, but I may not find time for a bit. > > > > I have understood the problem and I'll like to fix it. shall I do it? Have you got an FSF copyright assignment on file? It doesn't look like it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC