From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2546 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2005 16:52:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2510 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2005 16:52:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2005 16:52:13 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.44 #1 (Debian)) id 1DBbkj-0001lT-6G; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 11:52:13 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:52:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Mitchell Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH: Allow for systems that do not define SIGQUIT/SIGPIPE Message-ID: <20050316165213.GA6764@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Mitchell , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200503161633.j2GGX3Fl020753@sethra.codesourcery.com> <20050316164309.GA5418@nevyn.them.org> <4238641D.70403@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4238641D.70403@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00218.txt.bz2 On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 08:51:41AM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 08:33:03AM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote: > > > >>Windows does not have SIGQUIT or SIGPIPE. > >> > >>Tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. > >> > >>OK? > > > > > >You should probably #ifdef out handle_sigquit and its prototype also, > >or GCC will warn about it. Right? See the example for SIGWINCH. > > Actually, GCC doesn't warn because handle_sigquit references itself. :-) > > I'll make that change; OK, assuming it builds? Yes, is ok. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC